It didn't.
Hampered by a limited budget at a studio spiraling down in the years following the death of its founder, 1973's Robin Hoodmarked the low point in Disney animation.
Robin Hood and Little John, walking through the forest |
Plenty.
Robin Hood went so far out of its way to be family-friendly, it jettisoned most of the swashbuckling derring-do that made earlier film versions of the story so exciting. Robin Hood (Brian Bedford) and his hefty sidekick Little John (Harris, still channeling Baloo from The Jungle Book) spend a lot of time just walking, talking and playing tricks on the buffoonish (you can't really call him evil) Prince John (Ustinov). They do get in some scrapes, most notably at an archery contest set up by the prince to capture Robin, but the ensuing chase is so broadly slapstick with runaway tents and crashing elephants, there's little fear that our heroes are in any real danger. Even in the climactic scene where Robin finally confronts the lazy (you can't really call him menacing) Sheriff of Nottingham (Buttram), Robin's final plan of action is not to fight, but to run away. Oh, the sacrifices you must make to keep a G-rating.
Robin Hood's worst transgression, though, is how it blatantly recycled animation from earlier Disney films, as this often-viewed YouTube video illustrates:
Disney would redeem itself somewhat in 1977 with the release of The Rescuers, but more than a dozen years would pass after Robin Hood before the animation studio would truly begin to rise from the ashes and be a creative force again.
This is part two of my 30-day Disney movie challenge. Tomorrow, we rev up the engine for my favorite Disney comedy.
www.disneynewsarchive.com
www.facebook.com/disneynewsarchive
www.twitter.com/disneytim
www.youtube.com/disneytim
I had no idea that this was a bad movie. We kinda like it. :)
ReplyDeleteP.S. We are dorks.
Nothing wrong with being a Disney dork, lol. We all have our favorites. "Robin Hood" just isn't mine.
ReplyDelete